I thought at first that the key is that the reveal is not random in a game show. But, I think now that it doesn't actually matter whether the reveal is random or not. The math is the same.
I thought at first that the key is that the reveal is not random in a game show. But, I think now that it doesn't actually matter whether the reveal is random or not. The math is the same.
.
From:
no subject
Personally I think the fact that the reveal is not random actually destroys the math. Because the math is based on odds and probability, and probability is based on information, and someone with more information than you have is manipulating how much information you get.
From:
no subject
Or let me put it another way: There are three doors, A, B, and C. One has a prize, two have junk. Monty asks you to pick a door, you pick A. Now Monty opens a door, but he doesn't open the door you picked, so he's going to open either B or C.
If the prize is behind A, he can pick between B and C at random. But if the prize isn't behind A, then it's behind either B or C, and he can't pick at random, he has to pick whichever one doesn't have the prize.
From:
no subject
The reason it works the way it does is because his choice isn't random 2/3 of the time -- if the prize is behind B, he must open C and vice versa.
I've got a variety of ways to explain it. It's isomorphic to a problem that often comes up in the play of a bridge hand, so bridge discussion groups get the thread all the time.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject