drcpunk: (Default)
([personal profile] drcpunk Jan. 25th, 2009 04:09 am)
If anyone had any doubt that reading aloud is a skill, I suspect that the poetry reading at the inauguration cleared that away. [livejournal.com profile] pocketnaomi's guess was that the poet hadn't read aloud before in front of a live mike with a 2-second echo delay.

This, of course, is why one needs to practice.

I have written and read aloud academic papers. Lee Gold noted that the sound of an academic paper is not as critical as the sound of a poem, but I disagree. In 2007, I presented a very well received paper at MythCon. [livejournal.com profile] ellen_kushner complimented me, saying that, in the entire paper, there was only one sentence that was not harmonious. This is why I rehearsed and rehearsed.

I also rehearse to get my reading speed down. Before I gave my very first paper, at the ICFA, [livejournal.com profile] cattitude gave me much valuable advice, including what to do when running short on time. "The one thing you are not permitted to do," he said, "is to speed up."

As anyone who has met me can attest, my natural speaking speed is rapid. I practice reading my papers as slowly as I can bear. This gets my reading speed down to "Yes, you were a little fast, but we could understand everything."

I rehearse to see what phrases I will trip over. One of my teachers in grad school, Professor Catherine McKenna, once talked about a paper she delivered on some of the tales in the Mabinogion. If I remember correctly: She explained that, in Welsh, the possessive is "of PROPER NOUN", rather than "PROPER NOUN-suffix". She read aloud a paper with such words as "Pwyll's" and "Rhiannon's", and quickly discovered that these words are veritable tongue twisters.

I read aloud to see what sentences work. A paper that is read by a reader can have convoluted syntax. The reader can, if need be, look back and reread a sentence or a paragraph. But, if you're listening to the paper, a tangled sentence breaks your concentration. By the time you've figured out what I've said, or failed to figure it out, you've missed the next sentence. So, I want to make sure that my syntax is blazingly obvious. This may not mean short sentences, but it must mean clear ones.

And, there's questions of emphasis, especially when I quote.

When Neil Gaiman read chapter one of The Graveyard Book aloud at Columbia, he was asked if the publisher made him read all of his books aloud, for audio books. He replied that the publisher did not "make" him do this. The publisher allowed him to do this. Not all authors are good at reading aloud, he said, and, indeed, most are not.

As anyone who has ever heard him can attest, Neil Gaiman reads aloud very, very well. Anyone who has not ever heard him read aloud is encouraged to do so. He reads the entire novel The Graveyard Book. Listen. Watch him. Then, watch and listen again. Look at what he does and how he does it.

Another author who reads aloud very well is Catherynne Valente. She reads aloud sections from The Orphan's Tales. No video, but listen.

From: [identity profile] otherdeb.livejournal.com


Yes, Gaiman reading aloud is a joy to experience. I am not a big Gaiman fan but, at some point a very long time ago, [livejournal.com profile] roadnotes took a bunch of us to see him read at CBGB's. He read the story about an old lady finding the Holy Grail at an Oxfam shop, and had me hooked from practically the first word he uttered.

From: [identity profile] drcpunk.livejournal.com


Ah yes, I know that story. It was quietly amusing to read, but I'm sure it would be wonderful read aloud. "Chivalry" is the name, I think.

I'm not a huge fan of his novel Anansi Boys, but, when he read from it at Noreascon 4, it was wonderful.
kyrielle: Middle-aged woman in profile, black and white, looking left, with a scarf around her neck and a white background (Default)

From: [personal profile] kyrielle


I didn't watch that part of the inauguration but I will say that IMHO, poetry is an especial bitch to read aloud. You not only have to be clear, understandable, and engaging, but if there's any rhythm or pattern or line breaks other than at sentence ends, you need to convey that. And while poets accept prose poems AS poetry the average public usually doesn't....

From: [identity profile] drcpunk.livejournal.com


Yes. This is why rehearsal is important, even if you have the words in front of you, even if you wrote it yourself.

Mind, one can do decent cold readings. Actors do it all the time. [livejournal.com profile] mnemex did a fine cold reading of the short story "Palimpsest" (by Valente) when we were on the train (appropriate). And I did a reasonable one when I read Joanna Russ's "My Boat" for [livejournal.com profile] osewalrus to ask how one might get this down to 8 minutes or less, 8 minutes being the maximum length considered friendly for an average story. E.g., if you're telling a 20 minute story in a circle, even a story swap circle, it had better be kick ass, and so had you. And, I've done short pieces without rehearsal, ranging from Tom Digby's odd pieces to one of my favorite bits from John M. Ford's Growing Up Weightless to his Harry of Five Points.

I've done some poetry in filk circles, none of it mine. I've read one or two of Ford's sonnets, and I'd at least given them a run through once. I've read his magnificent "Winter Solstice, Camelot Station" a couple of times, and that really could use more of a rehearsal before I try it again. That is, I think I read acceptably, but rehearsal might make it actually good.

kyrielle: Middle-aged woman in profile, black and white, looking left, with a scarf around her neck and a white background (Default)

From: [personal profile] kyrielle


Yep. And some ppl cold read better than others and some stories and poems are easier. For something as important and visible as the inauguration tho....

I think my favorite poem to read aloud is Marvin Bell's "To Dorothy" but that owes a lot to my simply loving that poem.
.